SAP Integration Suite on BTP
Cloud integration, API management, event mesh and the design patterns that keep a BTP landscape maintainable.
Integration
Integration is judged on period close, not on a demo. We work across SAP Integration Suite on BTP and existing PI and PO landscapes, including the migration between them, and we build error handling as a first-class part of the design rather than an afterthought.
Integration Suite and PI/PO
We work in both, including the migration path from one to the other.
Tested under real volume
Interfaces proved at peak load, not at demo load.
Errors surface, not vanish
Monitoring and reprocessing designed in, so a failed message is visible.
The problem
Most integration problems are not connectivity problems. They are design decisions that hold at low volume and stop holding at the exact moment the business needs them.
Every direct connection is fine on its own. Fifty of them mean no one can change a system without breaking something they have never seen.
An interface proved on a hundred records behaves differently on a hundred thousand, and period close is where you find out.
Without monitoring and a reprocessing path, a failed message is discovered by a user asking why a number is wrong.
Existing middleware still works, but sitting on it indefinitely without a plan turns a technical decision into a deadline.
An interface is not finished when the message arrives. It is finished when a failed message tells someone.
Our test for every integration
What we do
Both toolsets, because most real landscapes are mid-transition rather than cleanly on one or the other.
Cloud integration, API management, event mesh and the design patterns that keep a BTP landscape maintainable.
Support, enhancement and optimisation of existing Process Integration and Process Orchestration, including the assessment for moving off it.
Interfaces assessed, prioritised and moved in waves, with both running in parallel until each one is proved.
Well-shaped, documented and versioned APIs, so the next system to connect does not require a new project.
Manufacturing systems, warehouse systems, banks, portals, e-invoicing platforms and whatever else the business genuinely runs on.
Alerting, dashboards and a reprocessing path, so a failed message becomes a task rather than a mystery.
How it runs
The stage most often skipped is the one that decides whether the interface survives period close.
Every existing interface catalogued: what it moves, how often, who depends on it and what happens when it stops.
Patterns chosen deliberately, with error handling, retry and reprocessing designed in from the start.
Developed on Integration Suite or the existing platform, with documentation written as part of the work.
Tested at realistic peak volume, including failure scenarios, before anything goes near production.
Alerting and dashboards handed over, so support sees a problem before a user reports one.
Who this is for
Integration will not fix a broken process. If two systems disagree because the process is ambiguous, an interface simply moves the disagreement faster.
We will also push back on connecting a system that should be retired instead. Building an interface to a system you are about to switch off is work nobody should pay for.
Often bought with
Most teams cannot produce a current list of what is connected to what. Building that list is short, cheap, and usually the most useful thing we do in the first month.